Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Colburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1921No. Civ. No. 3405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This action is one upon five promissory notes made and executed by the defendant, Philip Colburn, to the plaintiff and alleged to be duly indorsed by the appellant, the Standard Canning Company of San Diego. Upon a trial judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

Appellant does not dispute that the indorsement was placed upon each of the notes in question over the seal of the corporation, together with its guaranty of payment and a waiver of presentation to maker, demand of payment, protest, and notice of nonpayment. It is undisputed that these indorsements, guaranties, and waivers were signed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Woods Lumber Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. KushnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Phillips v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Davis v. Pacific Studios Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Talmadge v. Clewiston Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API