Legal Opinion
Woods Lumber Co. v. Moore
California Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1920No. L. A. No. 6055PublishedCited by 29 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Adams, Adams & Binford, G. Harold Janeway, Hunsaker, Britt & Edwards and Samuel Poorman, Jr., for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment. The plaintiff sued to recover of Goldstein Company, as guarantor, the sum of $2,845.55 owing to plaintiff from Continental Producing Company for building materials and merchandise bought of plaintiff by said Continental Company. The guaranty contract alleged to have been executed by Goldstein Company is as follows:
“Jan. 6, 1917.
“Woods Lumber Company,
“Beverly Hills, Calif. f ‘ Gentlemen:
“This is to confirm conversation Mr. Woods had with B. Goldstein on the afternoon of the 4th inst., guaranteeing the payment of all bills which you have or will have…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Northside Railway Co. v. WorthingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Best Brewing Co. v. KlassenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Stockton Harbor Industrial Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Southern California Enterprises, Inc. v. D. N. & E. Walter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hayman v. ShoemakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.