Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Byers

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1922No. L. A. No. 6653PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

The plaintiff, Win. S. Phillips, brought this action against the defendant, James C. Byers, sheriff of San Diego County, to ■ recover damages for the alleged cofiversion by defendant of certain goods upon which the plaintiff claimed to hold a chattel mortgage. The goods consisted of 585 dozen cans of string beans and 32 dozen cans of catsup, the property of the Standard Canning Company, a corporation, whose business was the buying and canning of raw fruits and vegetables, and which company had canned the goods in question.

On August 1, 1919, the company gave to one A. S. Bridges a promissory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Des Granges v. Des GrangesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Jacks v. Williams-Robinson Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
  5. Irwin v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Ziperstein v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API