Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1918No. Civ. No. 2104PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought upon two guaranty contracts executed by defendant corporation for the payment of certain merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff corporation to one W. Y. Lawton, an individual doing business under the fictitious name of “American Packing Company.” Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant on the ground that the manager of defendant corporation had no authority to execute the guaranties in question.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: Plaintiff is a manufacturing and trading corporation dealing in food products. Defendant is a business corporation dealing,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winterfield v. Cream City of Brewing CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hess v. W. & J. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Timm v. Grand Rapids Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Bacon v. Montauk Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carlesimo v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Greve v. Taft Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Barrett v. Hammer Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Modoc County Bank v. RinglingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API