Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Barney
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8402PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for change of venue.
The complaint alleges that Lydia IT. Barney died on January 6, 1927, leaving no issue, and that no administration has been had upon her estate; that plaintiff is the grandson of decedent and an heir at law; that' defendants are granddaughters of decedent; that about a month prior to her death, decedent deeded certain real property in the city and county of San Francisco and the county of San Mateo to appellants herein; that at said time decedent was mentally incapable of transacting business; that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Booker v. AitkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Donohoe v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sloss v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Franklin v. DuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jameson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.