Donohoe v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Walter H. Linforth, and Linforth & Herrington, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of Glenn County refusing to grant a motion of defendants for an order changing the place of trial of the action from the superior court of Glenn County to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco.
Defendants were entitled to have the action transferred to the city and county of San Francisco, the place of their resi dence, if it does not fall within the purview of section 5 of article VI of the constitution, or section 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Whether it does or not is the question presented by this appeal.
Sectio…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Traphagen v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Standard Brands of California v. BryceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hannah v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.