Franklin v. Dutton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County changing the place of trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
—This action was commenced in the superior court of the county of Santa Barbara for the *606reformation of a contract for the sale by plaintiffs to defendant of a certain tract of land lying in .said county. Defendant demurred to the complaint, and at the same time demanded a change of the place of trial to San Francisco, the place of his residence. The court made an order changing the place of trial as demanded. From that order plaintiffs appealed, and contend here that under section 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure they are entitled to have the action tried in the county of Santa Barbara,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McKinney v. MiresMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.