Legal Opinion

Bakke v. Buck

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 7, 1978No. 3401-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

— The estate of Herbert Bakke appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the Bucks for $26,122.89 in usury penalties and $5,000 attorney's fees against the estate. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

During the period from 1966 to 1973, Herbert Bakke loaned the Bucks $109,000. The Bucks signed promissory notes of $35,000, $25,000, $24,000, and $25,000. Shortly before Bakke's death in 1975, the Bucks still owed approximately $92,000 on the notes and had defaulted on their payments. The personal representatives of Bakke's estate elected to accelerate the debt and sued to collect. They…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Peoples National Bank of Washington v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bingham v. LechnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Bingham v. LechnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Detonics ".45" Associates v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Demopolis v. GalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API