Bingham v. Lechner
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
Christopher Demopolis appeals the trial court’s judgment that permanently restrained him from foreclosing on a deed of trust Bernice Bingham had given Demopolis to secure a promissory note. The trial court concluded that the statute of limitations barred Demopolis’s nonjudicial foreclosure proceeding. The court also denied Demopolis’s request to offset the amount owed on the notes against the attorney fees it awarded Ronald Bingham, Bernice Bingham’s personal representative. We agree with the trial court that Demopolis’s nonjudicial foreclosure proceeding is time barred. The trial court did…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Pederson v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Meyers Way Development Ltd. Partnership v. University Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Apostolis v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bingham v. LechnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Perry v. Costco Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Perry v. Costco Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Cedar W. Owners Ass'n v. Nationstar Mortg., LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. ManionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.