Legal Opinion

Detonics ".45" Associates v. Bank of California

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1982No. 48222-5PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Plaintiff Detonics ".45" Associates entered into a loan agreement with defendant Bank of California, N.A. The loan was repaid. Subsequently this action was brought in which plaintiffs alleged the loan to be usurious under RCW 19.52. At trial, the arguments made by both plaintiffs and defendant were to the applicability of Washington statutes. At the conclusion of the trial, the court found the agreement to be usurious and in its oral opinion allowed attorney fees. Time was granted by the court to calculate those fees. Defendant moved for reconsideration and in its supporting memorandum for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Herzog Aluminum, Inc. v. General American Window Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Absher Const. Co. v. KENT SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Vogt v. Seattle-First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Dependency of Penelope B.Washington Supreme Court · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API