Legal Opinion

Ennis v. Ring

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1959No. 34593PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

— This case is before us for the second time. The first appeal followed a nonsuit granted at the close of plaintiffs’ case, Ennis v. Ring, 49 Wn. (2d) 284, 300 P. (2d) 773 (1956).

February 15, 1944, Walter S. Wynhoff and Ethel O. Wynhoff, his wife, executed a lease of a 4,300-acre ranch to Harold E. Ring and Edwin W. Ring. It provided for a term of ten years and one month, terminating April 1, 1954, and an annual cash rental of $1,700. The rent was to be paid on or before December 1st of each year, with the exception of rent for the last year, which was payable on or before October 1, 1954,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Jones v. JacobsonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In Re Smith's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hendricks v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Riley v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Buza v. Columbia Lumber CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API