Legal Opinion

Jenssen v. R. K. O. Studios, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1937No. Civ. 5790PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELD, J., pro tem.

Defendant and respondent R. K. O. Studios, Inc., is a producer of motion pictures, and defendants and respondents Merian C. Cooper, Jane Murfin and Albert Shelby Le Vino were in its employ, the former as an executive producer, and the latter two as writers. Plaintiff and appellant alleges that she submitted to the corporate defendant a certain literary composition to enable said defendant to determine whether it desired to acquire the same for use in motion pictures. The complaint alleges also that said defendant retained said composition for about one month and thereupon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dam v. Lake Aliso Riding SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Chatfield v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bergerow v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Larmour v. CampanaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. In Re StaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Ware v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API