Legal Opinion

Ware v. Stafford

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1962No. Civ. 26042PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

On April 4, 1955, plaintiffs Ware filed the within action against defendant Stafford to cancel an oil lease dated April 15, 1948, and to quiet title in the real property involved. The lease, among other covenants, provided: “If no production is obtained from said well within a period óf six months from the effective date of the permits herein-before set forth, then this indenture shall terminate.” Plaintiffs claimed that defendant wholly failed to perform and to exercise reasonable diligence to place the well on production ; and that under the terms of the lease and notices served on him all…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. People ex rel. Schwartz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. FindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Farm Workers of America v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zavala v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF LELAND STANFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Perlman v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. City of Oakland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Kallman v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API