Legal Opinion

Idaho Department of Fish & Game, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Appellee, Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee v. National Marine Fisheries Service, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. Of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp.), Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant v. Randall W. Hardy, in His Official Capacity as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee. Idaho Department of Fish & Game, and State of Oregon, Intervenor-Appellee v. National Marine Fisheries Service, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee v. Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant v. Randall W. Hardy, in His Official Capacity as Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 1, 1995No. 94-35524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 F.3d 1071

40 ERC 2005, Util. L. Rep. P 14,049

IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH & GAME, Plaintiff-Appellee,

State of Oregon, Intervenor-Appellee,

Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee,

v.

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee,

Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. of

America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum

Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical

Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp., et al.), Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant,

v.

Randall W. HARDY, in his official capacity as Administrator

of the Bonneville Power…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  4. Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Canoe Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
  2. National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2003
  3. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers, and State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers, and State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Public Power Council, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, and Public Power Council, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, and Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, and Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. Of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp.), Defendants-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Pacific Lumber Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API