Legal Opinion
National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 7, 2003No. CV 01-640-REPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REDDEN, District Judge.
The matters before the court are plaintiffs’ motion (doc. 281) for summary judgment; defendant’s motion (doc. 349) for summary judgment; defendant-intervenor State of Idaho’s motion (doc. 356) for summary judgment; and defendant-intervenor Inland Ports and Navigation Group’s motion (doc. 361) for summary judgment. Oral argument was held April 21, 2003. 1
NATURE OF THE ACTION
On December 21, 2000, following consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA) 2 issued a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sierra Club v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District, United States of America v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- American Rivers v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Oceana, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.