Legal Opinion

Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers, and State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers, and State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Public Power Council, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, and Public Power Council, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, and Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. Oregon Natural Resources Council, Inc. Sierra Club Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation American Rivers v. National Marine Fisheries Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, and Direct Service Industrial Customers (Aluminum Co. Of America, Atochem North America, Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corp., Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., Intalco Aluminum Corp.), Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1995No. 94-35334PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

56 F.3d 1060

40 ERC 1996, Util. L. Rep. P 14,048

NORTHWEST RESOURCE INFORMATION CENTER, INC.; Oregon Natural

Resources Council, Inc.; Sierra Club;

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the

Yakima Indian Nation;

American Rivers,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

State of Idaho, Department of Fish & Game,

Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, Defendants-Appellants.

NORTHWEST RESOURCE INFORMATION CENTER, INC.; Oregon Natural

Resources Council, Inc.; Sierra Club;

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the

Yakima Indian Nation;

American Rivers,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

State…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Committee on Natural Resources v. Van WinkleDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
  2. Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  3. North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1999
  4. Benton County v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API