Legal Opinion

American Canoe Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 18, 1998No. 98-979-APublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this suit assert that the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA), in conjunction with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), impose various nondiscretionary and discretionary duties on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and that EPA has failed to perform these duties. In its Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., threshold dismissal motion, EPA, joined by intervenor, Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (VAMWA), denies that such duties exist or, alternatively, claims that EPA has fulfilled…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Communities for a Better Environment v. Cenco Refining Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
  3. American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. American Forest Resource Council v. AsheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. FoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API