Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Markham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1912No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by George 0. Snyder and Edna E. Snyder against Lester B. Markham. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case upon promises, in which plaintiffs seek to recover the *694value of an automoble (worth about $600) and an equity in a land contract (valued at $200), together with certain moneys expended by them in undertaking to carry on the business contemplated by them in making the deal in question.

It appears that .plaintiffs sold said automobile and assigned their interest in said land contract to defendant in consideration of an exclusive right to sell “butter doublers” in the counties of Ottawa and Allegan, Mich., together with 1Ó0 of the machines, known as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lacy v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Witt v. DershamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Fournier v. CluttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zadel v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dalheimer v. LuciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cox v. HolkeboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Renga v. DarlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Salata v. DylewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API