Legal Opinion

Witt v. Dersham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1906No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Replevin by John P. Witt against George Dersham. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action of replevin for certain hay sold by defendant to plaintiff under a verbal contract, the terms of which are agreed upon except as to the time of delivery. By the agreement plaintiff was to bale the hay at once at his own expense, and was to pay the defendant therefor $8 per ton when the hay was delivered by' defendant at the car in Holloway, a station on the Wabash Railroad. The plaintiff testified that by the agreement the baled hay was to remain in defendant’s barn until such time as plaintiff could procure a car after shipping out three car loads under prior contracts. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Jones v. Preferred Bankers' Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lacy v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Galvin v. Galvin Brass & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Burke v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Commercial Investment TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. American Textile MacHine Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  3. Hedrick v. FirkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Range v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rudin v. King-Richardson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API