Legal Opinion

Cox v. Holkeboer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Benjamin F. Cox and another against Henry Holkeboer and another for money obtained by fraud and deceit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

In April, 1915, defendant, through his agent, DeKeyzer, sold upon contract to plaintiffs a 40-acre farm in Ottawa county for the sum of $2,500. Prior to the purchase thereof plaintiffs were shown the farm by DeKeyzer. They appeared to be pleased with it and inclined to purchase, but hesitated because they were under contract to do janitor work for the Howe Military Academy until the following spring. To overcome this objection it is claimed DeKeyzer promised if they would purchase at that time he would rent the premises for them for one year for the sum of $150. This was agreed to and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ballard v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Snyder v. MarkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Funk v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Burns v. MisuraMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ronczkowski v. JozwiakMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Salata v. DylewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API