Renga v. Darling

The plaintiffs claimed to have been defrauded in a land deal with defendants. They brought this suit to recover damages. At the close of the testimony a motion was made on the part of the defendants for a directed verdict. This motion was overruled and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,662.50. The case is brought into this court by writ of error.

We quote from the brief of the defendants:

“Points relied upon for reversal:

“(1) Error in the court refusing to direct a verdict for the defendants.

“(2) Errors in refusing defendants’ request to charge.”

A recital…