Legal Opinion

Dalheimer v. Lucia

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jon.\son, J.

This is an action to recover damages for fraud and deceit. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,600 and interest from May 1, 1912. Thereafter, a motion for a new trial was duly made and an appeal taken from the judgment and from the order denying a motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff and defendants, in December, 1910, were residents of Hurley, AYisconsin. In December, 1910, and in January and February, 1911, negotiations were had between the defendants, who were engaged in business in Hurley, and the plaintiff, who was engaged in teaming at that place…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Parliman v. YoungSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1879
  4. Rodee v. SeamanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Snyder v. MarkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schue v. JacobyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. HuncovskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Emanuel v. EngstNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Thompson v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API