Perez v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits on the basis that an intemperate verbal exchange with his employer was “misconduct.” ORS 657.176(2)(a); OAR 471-030-0038(3)(a). We conclude that, even if claimant’s outburst was a wilful violation of employer’s reasonable expectations, it was part of an “isolated instance of poor judgment” and, thus, was not “misconduct.” OAR 471-030-0038(3)(b). Accordingly, we reverse.
Claimant worked for employer for 13 years, from March 11, 1985 to June 24, 1998. As a crew supervisor at employer’s wholesale…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Grants Pass v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Goodwin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Halling v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Steel Yard, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Double K Kleaning Service, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- MacKillop v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.