Legal Opinion

Perez v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1999No. EAB 98-AB-2491; CA A104860PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Claimant seeks review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment benefits on the basis that an intemperate verbal exchange with his employer was “misconduct.” ORS 657.176(2)(a); OAR 471-030-0038(3)(a). We conclude that, even if claimant’s outburst was a wilful violation of employer’s reasonable expectations, it was part of an “isolated instance of poor judgment” and, thus, was not “misconduct.” OAR 471-030-0038(3)(b). Accordingly, we reverse.

Claimant worked for employer for 13 years, from March 11, 1985 to June 24, 1998. As a crew supervisor at employer’s wholesale…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Grants Pass v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Goodwin v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Halling v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Steel Yard, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Double K Kleaning Service, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. MacKillop v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API