Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2003No. 01-AB-1401; A115897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*443KISTLER, J.

The Employment Appeals Board (board) held that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he intentionally submitted a false work report. On review, claimant does not dispute that he submitted a false report. Rather, he argues that doing so should not disqualify him from receiving benefits. We affirm.

Claimant worked for Excell Marketing, a trading card distributor, as a territory account manager, and his position required him to service various retail outlets throughout Oregon and southwest Washington. Employer required claimant to submit, at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. OttOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. White v. Jubitz Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-BirranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Jordan v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API