Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 1977No. 76-AB-979, CA 7066PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Employer appeals from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) holding claimant qualified to receive unemployment compensation benefits by virtue of having been terminated for reasons other than misconduct connected with her work. ORS 657.176(2)(b). Employer contends that the Board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8)(d). 1

Claimant worked for employer as a bartender for a one-year period about five years ago and again from July 1975 to May 1976. When claimant previously worked for employer, she was informed of a rule which forbade employes from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Geraths v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Balduyck v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Eastep v. Veterinary Medical Examining BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Groener v. Oregon Government Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Saxon v. Division of State LandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Damascus Community Church v. Clackamas County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Lundy v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API