Legal Opinion
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Isner
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 20, 1950No. Civ. A. 8889PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOSCINSKI, District Judge.
This suit is brought and the jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under the provisions of Secs. 204(a) (6) and 222(b) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 304(a) (6), 322(b), and under the general laws and rules relative to suits in equity arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
The complaint charges that ■ defendant David Isner, a resident of Detroit, Michigan, is engaged in the transportation of property in interstate commerce by motor vehicle, for compensation, on public highways between Detroit, Michigan, and South…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Piedmont & Northern Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Bridge Auto Renting Corporation v. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. GannoeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Empire Box Corp. v. Willard Sulzberger Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. WernerDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.