Legal Opinion
Empire Box Corp. v. Willard Sulzberger Motor Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 6, 1952No. Civ. 195-49PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is an .action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201. The jurisdiction of the Court is based upon Sections 1331 and 1332 of Title 28 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1331 and 1332. The plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that a contract, heretofore made by the Empire Box Corporation and the defendant, is illegal. The Interstate Commerce Commission, having been granted leave to inter vene in this action, filed a complaint seeking similar relief and in addition thereto “such other and further relief as may be just and proper.”
Facts
I
The Empire Box Corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Davis v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ets-Hokin & Galvan, Inc. v. Maas Transport, Inc., and B. L. Lawrence, D/B/A Lawrence TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Switchmen's Union of North America v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Reo Distribution Services, Inc. v. Fisher Controls International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995
- Briggs Transfer Co. v. National Butter Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- City of New York v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.