Legal Opinion

State v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 4, 2009No. 060343216; A133292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for carrying a concealed weapon. ORS 166.240(1). Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that, as a result of an officer’s unlawful seizure of defendant, that police officer obtained evidence that defendant possessed a dagger. We review the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress for errors of law, State v. Rider, 216 Or App 308, 310, 172 P3d 274 (2007), rev dismissed, 345 Or 595 (2008), and reverse and remand.

The facts are largely undisputed. Where the facts are disputed, we are bound by the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API