Legal Opinion

State v. Wyatt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2000No. CC CR9501237; CA A95425; SC S45859PublishedCited by 514 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The state seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision reversing defendant’s convictions for rape, sexual abuse, and delivery of a controlled substance. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court committed reversible error in excluding the testimony of defendant’s expert witness as a sanction for a violation of the reciprocal criminal discovery statutes. State v. Wyatt, 155 Or App 192, 962 P2d 780 (1998). Because we conclude that defendant did not preserve at trial the issue of the appropriate sanction, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

In preparation for defendant’s trial,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by514 opinions

  1. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004

509 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API