Legal Opinion

State v. Madden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2017No. 201305158; A155807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, one count of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, and two counts of possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. Defendant assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that the seizure of defendant that led to the discovery of evidence was justified by officer safety concerns. On review for errors of law, State v. Holdorf, 355 Or 812, 814, 333 P3d 982 (2014), we conclude that the trial court’s conclusion was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. GaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API