State v. Leino
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful possession of cocaine, ORS 475.884, and unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that the police officer’s observations leading to the search that produced evidence of drugs were made during an unlawful extension of an initially lawful traffic stop. We review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress for errors of law. State v. Chambers, 226 Or App 363, 365, 203 P3d 337 (2009). We conclude that the stop was not unlawfully extended, and therefore affirm.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. NimsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. PaulingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012