Legal Opinion
Manteca Union High School District v. City of Stockton
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1961No. Civ. 10155PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
Appellant school districts and several affected landowners, complaining that proceedings of respondent city, its city council and clerk, taken under the “Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939” (Gov. Code, §§ 35300 et seq.) were illegal, appeal from a superior court judgment denying them a writ of certiorari.
Broadly stated, the questions are:
1. Was there a termination of the original proceedings when, to correct an omission in its resolution setting the annexation petition for hearing, the city council adopted a second resolution, purporting to “rescind” the first?
2. Did the 1959…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bateman v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re CatheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Vista v. Sutro & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Forest Lawn Co. v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Zack v. Marin Emergency Radio AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Olson v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bayshore Sanitary District v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.