Legal Opinion

Olson v. City of Hawthorne

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1965No. Civ. 28814PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

— Plaintiffs, owners of real property located in the territory described as the “Lisso Annexation,” sued the City of Hawthorne to annul its proceedings to annex the territory and to prevent it from taking further action therein. After trial, the court denied the peremptory writ of mandate and entered judgment for defendant; plaintiffs appeal therefrom.

The record on appeal consists of a clerk’s transcript and copies of certain exhibits; it does not include the reporter’s transcript of the oral proceedings at the trial. Thus, we treat the instant appeal as one on the judgment roll, and only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bristow v. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Anderson v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API