Legal Opinion

In Re Cathey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1961No. Crim. 6813, 6819PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

— By applications for habeas corpus petitioner, who is confined in the California Medical Facility at Vacaville, complains of the place and conditions of his detention. The Medical Facility is supervised by the Director of Corrections and operated under the statutory provisions which apply to "a prison under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections . . . insofar as such provisions may be applicable.’' (Pen. Code, §6106.) "The primary purpose of the Medical Facility shall be the receiving, segregation, confinement, treatment and care of males under the custody of the Department of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. KempCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API