Legal Opinion
Bayshore Sanitary District v. City of Brisbane
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1965No. Civ. No. 21693PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
On this appeal, the Bayshore Sanitary District (hereafter referred to as District) urges that its petition for a writ of review, prohibition or mandate to set aside annexation proceedings of the City of Brisbane (hereafter referred to as City) under the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 (hereafter referred to as the Uninhabited Territory Act) (Gov. Code, §§ 35300-35326) should have been granted. The District cites the following alleged errors by the trial court as grounds for reversal: (1) the conclusion that the territory annexed was uninhabited pursuant to section 35303 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Johnson v. City of San PabloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Pennington v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.