Forest Lawn Co. v. City Council
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
This case involves the validity of proceedings of the City Council of West Covina pursuant to the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 (Gov. Code, § 35300 et seq.). We hold that in determining whether the “owners of one-half of the value of the territory proposed to be annexed” have protested the annexation, the above statute requires an apportionment of the value of a single piece of land, part of which lies inside, and part outside, of the area of annexation. We hold also that the county assessor, rather than the city council, should determine such apportionment. Finally, we do…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Jefferson Union School District v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Fuller v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Enyeart v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Guerrieri v. City of FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Zack v. Marin Emergency Radio AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.