Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Godman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
The following is the only portion of appellees’ complaint that needs to be here set out, viz.: “ The plaintiffs complain of the defendant and say, that the defendant is a railroad corporation operating a line of railroad between Battle Ground City, in said county, and the city of ■Chicago, in the State of Illinois, and that at and before the time hereinafter named, said defendant held out to the general public, and caused to be known, that it was a.common carrier of freight, stock and cattle, from said Battle Ground and. other stations on the line of said railroad between said Bat-*491tie Ground…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Brown v. WillIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Hays v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FlanaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Armacost v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. RenickerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.