Armacost v. Lindley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was commenced by Mary Harmon against the estate of Charles Harmon, deceased. The plaintiff died pending the action, and, on motion, Tence Lindley, administrator of her estate, was substituted as plaintiff.
The material averments in the complaint are, that on the 21st day of October, 1882, Mary Harmon and Charles Harmon were husband and wife, the former being the owner in her own right of twenty acres of land-in Howard county, the latter at the same time owning an undivided one-fourth *296of an adjoining twenty-acre tract; on the date above mentioned, Mrs. Harmon’s twenty acres and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Wales v. NewbouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- First National Bank v. RansfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Denny v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Jackson v. CreekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.