Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Renicker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1893No. 1,002PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Jasper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellee filed her complaint in one paragraph against the appellant, as follows:

“The plaintiff, Anna Renicker, complains of the defendant, The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Co., and says that the defendant is a corporation *405duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and, on the 26th day of June, 1891, owned and operated a certain railroad, known as the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Co., with the track, cars, locomotives and other appurtenances thereto belonging, and was a common carrier of passengers for hire between Delphi, in Carroll county, Indiana,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hardin v. Olympic Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Gaines v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API