Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Flanagan
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.
Samantha A. and James W. Flanagan, partners doing business under the firm name of S. A. Flanagan & Co., commenced this suit against the appellant railway company to recover damages for the alleged violation of certain contracts which the plaintiffs charge were duly entered into between the parties to this action.
The eomjfiaint consisted of three paragraphs. In the first it is alleged that, in the month of October, 1882, the plaintiffs were the owners of a manufacturing establishment and machinery for the manufacture of staves and heading, located at Fisher’s Station, on the line of the Wabash…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne, & Chicago Railway Co. v. RubyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Muncie Natural Gas Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Standard Land Corporation of Indiana v. BogardusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.