Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1895No. 17,039PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Prom the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

— The appellee sued the appellant in a complaint of two paragraphs to recover damages for a personal injury in the loss of his arm, caused by the alleged *615negligence of appellant. The issues formed upon the complaint were tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for appellee for $6,000 over appellant’s motion for a new trial. The error assigned here is the overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Among the reasons assigned therefor in the motion, is the giving of certain instructions asked by the appellee. We are met at the threshold of the investigation of the question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Conrad v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API