Key v. Merritt-Holland Welding Supplies, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Since the first (negligence) issue was answered in favor of plaintiffs, errors, if any, in respect of evidence rulings or of portions of the charge pertinent to that issue are harmless. Wooten v. Cagle, 268 N.C. 366, 370, 150 S.E. 2d 738, 740, and cases cited; Watson v. Stallings, 270 N.C. 187, 192, 154 S.E. 2d 308, 311; Anderson v. Office Supplies, 236 N.C. 519, 521, 73 S.E. 2d 141, 142, and cases cited. Decision depends on whether there was prejudicial error in the court’s instructions with reference to the second (contributory negligence) issue.
G.S. 1-180 provides that “the judge shall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Wooten v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marley v. GraperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Prevette v. BullisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Cochran v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Kirk v. R. Stanford Webb Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.