Legal Opinion

Kirk v. R. Stanford Webb Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1985No. 8428SC921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Plaintiffs first assign as error the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury as specially requested. We find no error.

Without setting out the requested instruction herein, we note that the jury answered the issue to which the requested instruction pertained, i.e., negligence of defendant in failing to procure sufficient insurance to cover plaintiffs’ loss, in plaintiffs’ favor. Accordingly, even if there was error on the part of the trial court in failing to instruct the jury as requested by plaintiffs, the error is harmless. Key v. Merritt-Holland Welding Supplies, Inc.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Juno Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Key v. Merritt-Holland Welding Supplies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Hendrix v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Insurance Network of Texas v. Kloesel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  2. Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alfa Life Insurance Corp. v. ColzaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Martini v. Beaverton Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kron Medical Corp. v. Collier Cobb & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API