Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Cagle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1966No. 201PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The record shows twenty assignments of error based on fifty exceptions. Discussion will be limited to those constituting the basis for principal contentions set forth in plaintiff’s brief.

Plaintiff assigns as error, based on exceptions duly noted, the admission or exclusion, over plaintiff’s objections, of evidence relating to the speed of defendant’s car as it approached the scene of collision. This evidence was pertinent to the first (negligence) issue. Since this issue was answered in favor of plaintiff, error, if any, in the rulings challenged by these assignments is harmless. Coach Co.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson Ex Rel. Williamson v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Hamilton v. McCashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Wilson v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Phillips v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY v. FultzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Vernon v. CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Bell v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Hanks v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Cole v. StevensonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API