Legal Opinion

Prevette v. Bullis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1971No. 7123SC499PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Through her first assignment of error plaintiff contends that the court erroneously charged the jury on the doctrine of sudden emergency. The charge on sudden emergency related only to the issue of defendant’s negligence. That issue was answered in plaintiff’s favor. Consequently, error, if any, in portions of the charge pertinent only to that issue is harmless. Key v. Welding Supplies, 273 N.C. 609, 160 S.E. 2d 687; Wooten v. Cagle, 268 N.C. 366, 150 S.E. 2d 738.

Plaintiff next contends that the fact she permitted her car to stall for lack of gasoline did not constitute evidence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keller v. BrenemanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Chapin v. StickelWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Casey v. GritschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Wooten v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cochran v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Gray v. Orange County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Williams v. Steves Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Hendrix v. All American Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API