Cochran v. City of Charlotte
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Summary Of Law On Inverse Condemnation Of Avigation Or Flight Easements
For over half a century North Carolina statutes have authorized cities and towns to establish airports 2 and to acquire property for that purpose by exercise of the power of eminent domain. 3 Defendant did not seek, by direct exercise of this power, to condemn flight easements over plaintiffs’ properties. Plaintiffs allege, however, that defendant has in fact condemned such easements. Plaintiffs by this allegation claim an
“inverse condemnation,” a term often used to designate “a cause of action against a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Grace E. Avery v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- City of Statesville v. CloaningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Twitty v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.