Legal Opinion

Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. Justice

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1974No. 7421DC31PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court on several occasions violated Rule 51(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure by expressing an opinion in his instructions to the jury. Defendant also assigns as error the failure of the court to admit in evidence the tape-recorded conversation between himself and plaintiff. Defendant’s assignments of error relating to the charge are well founded and entitle him to a new trial, and thus it is unnecessary for this Court to decide whether the tape recording was properly excluded.

Under Rule 51 (a) the trial judge may not express an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. United States v. Raymond S. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WombleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Turman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. RourkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API