Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 2006No. 4639PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

KAUGER, J.

T1 The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), charged the respondent, John G. Maddox, (respondent/Maddox) with one count of professional misconduct resulting from a guilty plea on a charge of embezzlement by a public official. The Bar Association alleged that the attorney violated Rule 8.4, 5 0.8.2001 Ch. 1, App. 3-A,1 and Rule 1.3 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 0.$.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A.2 The Bar Association sought a one-year suspension and the payment of costs.3 Upon de novo review, we hold that the respondent's…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Pierce v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. LAY v. ELLISSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API