Legal Opinion

LAY v. ELLIS

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 2018No. 115,992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.:

*1037 ¶ 1 This retained cause presents multiple issues, one of which is when it is appropriate to appeal an indirect contempt finding. Under the facts of this cause, the respondent argues that the Court has created the set of circumstances which put him in the position of first having to completely purge the contempt (in this case a three year process) before appealing, thus violating his constitutional right of access to the courts. The remaining issues are whether the trial court: 1) improperly applied res judicata to a previous bankruptcy court proceeding; 2) improperly interpreted a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Eure v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  2. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. IN THE MATTER OF L.M.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. IN THE MATTER OF L.M.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. LAY v. ELLISSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. WESTERN HEIGHTS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API