Legal Opinion
Carl Joseph Maggio, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1984No. Docket Nos. 26587, 26609, 26605PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, J.
Two separate groups of petitioners (Carl Joseph Maggio, Inc., et al., and J. J. Crosetti Company, Inc., et al.) seek review of the final decision and order of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Board) in Admiral Packing Company, et al. (1981) 7 A.L.R.B. No. 43. Petitioners are all agricultural employers subject to the provisions of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (Act) (Lab. Code, § 1140 et seq.). The petitions have been consolidated by order of the court.
The underlying action arose from the inability of the United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UFW) and a major…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Herman Sausage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bertuccio v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Vessey & Co., Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Michael Hat Farming Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- United Farm Wkrs. of America v. Agricultural Labor Rel. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Carl Joseph Maggio, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.